[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Author Index (this month)][Thread Index (this month)][Top of Archive]

Re: Why not Word97?

Subject: Re: Why not Word97?
From: Ned Bedinger <doc -at- edwordsmith -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 21:48:09 +0000


Jonathan West wrote:


The fundamental file format is the same from Word 97 through Word 2003

Hi--

I'm wondering if you have the file format spec? There was a time (up until '95, iirc) that MS provided the spec on request. But then they went dark. Are they back to providing it again?

Thanks for any info.

Ned Bedinger
Ed Wordssmith Technical Communications

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROBOHELP X5 - SEE THE ALL NEW ROBOHELP X5 IN ACTION!

RoboHelp X5 is a giant leap forward in Help authoring technology, featuring all new Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author support, PDF and XML support and much more! View an online demo: http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrldemo

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Follow-Ups:

References:
RE: Why not Word97?: From: Jonathan West

Previous by Author: Re: slow writer
Next by Author: Re: slow writer
Previous by Thread: Re: Why not Word97?
Next by Thread: RE: Why not Word97?

[Top of Archive] | [Author Index (this month)] | [Thread Index (this month)]

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads