[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Author Index (this month)][Thread Index (this month)][Top of Archive]

[Fwd: Re: Identifying the source to generate a PDF?]

Subject: [Fwd: Re: Identifying the source to generate a PDF?]
From: Lisa Roth <roth -dot- lisa -at- jimmy -dot- harvard -dot- edu>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 09:16:30 -0500



Your message intrigued me, so I just peeked at a PDF that I created. I
have Reader 7.0.

I checked the Description tab of the Document Properties. Lo and behold!
The Title line indicates the original *.doc file name and that it was
produced in Microsoft Word!

I can't vouch for the possibility that this information is always
correct, but it is correct in this case. I wonder what are the chances
that it says "Microsoft Word" by default if it doesn't recognize the
authoring application...Hmm!

Interesting tidbit you brought up Richard! Wish I could help you solve
it, though.

Happy Friday


Lippincott Richard J Contr ESC/NI wrote:

Those of you who know me know that this is difficult for me, but I'm going to cut directly to the short version of a long story.

I'm trying to get some manuals published, and we've shipped PDF files to the government printing agency responsible for the job. They're balking, for a number of reasons.

One of the reasons floored me. The responsible manager claimed that by examining the PDF file, the print agency determined that the documents had been produced in MS Word. The manager's beef is that the contract requirements are that the documents be produced using tagged SGML.

So far as I know, there is no way to examine a PDF file and evaluate what word processor or DTP package was used to create the document.
Am I correct?
If there is a way to make the determination, what is it?

(Oh, BTW, in fact we DID use SGML, the documents were produced using Epic/Arbortext and a government approved DTD.)

Thanks...

--Rick Lippincott
Bedford, MA


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT - EDIT AND REVIEW, REDEFINED
Accelerate the document lifecycle with full online discussions and unique feedback-management capabilities. Unlimited, efficient reviews for Word
and FrameMaker authors. Live, online demo:
http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

Doc-To-Help 7.5 Professional: New version with new features, improved performance and reliability, plus much more! Download your free trial today at www.componentone.com/techwrlfeb.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: ADMIN re: Technical Writing - What's the catch?
Next by Author: Re: Smart Styler in a word template?
Previous by Thread: OT? Need replacement for "TalkScribe"
Next by Thread: FM/Acrobat/Friday! problem

[Top of Archive] | [Author Index (this month)] | [Thread Index (this month)]

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads