TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
My bad. Sorry. A poor choice of word there on my part. Blame it on my
now-not-so-trusty M-W O which misled me with its positive spin on
"finicky" - meticulous in taste or standards. :)
So I'll change "finicky" to "meticulous". I hope the whole point of my
response to Bill is clearer to you now. My point restated is, "Bill, you
may not care or see a problem, but "a meticulous editor" perhaps would.
And hence my query."
And I'm going to ignore your postscript entirely because it doesn't make
any sense to me. Maybe I'm missing something, but there's nobody
disagreeing with me at the moment.
But I however found the answer to my original query in your "since
there's a perfectly good and familiar word for the concept, we should
use it, rather than bending another word to a task for which it is
grammatically unsuited."
Now that's eminently useful. And I'm not going to ignore that. Thanks a
ton.
Cheers,
Jayaseelan
-----Original Message-----
From: bounce-techwr-l-141827 -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
[mailto:bounce-techwr-l-141827 -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On Behalf Of
dmbrown -at- brown-inc -dot- com
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 9:40 PM
To: TECHWR-L
Subject: Re: Displays vs. Appears
Jayaseelan Pannirselvam wrote:
> Bill Swallow wrote:
>>So you use "displays" and no one cares... I don't see the problem.
>
> Some finicky editors do. :)
It's not just so-called "finicky editors"--some of us figure that, since
there's a perfectly good and familiar word for the concept, we should
use
it, rather than bending another word to a task for which it is
grammatically unsuited. (I feel the same way about "impact" as a verb,
which is almost always incorrectly used in place of "affect.")
--David
P.S. It's funny how the people who disagree with us are described in
pejorative terms like "finicky," while those who agree with us
appear--or should I say "display"--to possess greater insight.
WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT - EDIT AND REVIEW, REDEFINED
Accelerate the document lifecycle with full online discussions and unique feedback-management capabilities. Unlimited, efficient reviews for Word
and FrameMaker authors. Live, online demo: http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.