RE: Username or user name (generalized)

["Bonnie Granat" <bgranat -at- granatedit -dot- com>]

>
> Yes. The advantages to doing it so outweight the disadvantages that
> unless his group is lazy and/or shiftless, there should not be a
> counter-argument.

If he lost the vote, I don't know that I'd advise fighting further.

You tell me...what justifyable reason is there for
> the documentation to intentionaly deviate from the application...to
> make the development people look better? Apperently they don't care.
> To hide their mistakes from those in management who might care?
> That's the purpose.
>

The purpose seems to me to make the developers look bad, not good.

If one's concerned about excellence, democracy is not the best way to run
a documentation department.


> --- Bonnie Granat <bgranat -at- granatedit -dot- com> wrote:
> >
> > Steve said he was outvoted by his group. To me, that means he has
> > to do
> > what the group decided or suffer the consequences. He apparently
> > cannot
> > follow the best advice -- documenting what's there. Are you
> > suggesting that he should insist on it?


-- 
Bonnie Granat
www.GranatEdit.com
Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT - EDIT AND REVIEW, REDEFINED
Accelerate the document lifecycle with full online discussions and unique feedback-management capabilities. Unlimited, efficient reviews for Word
and FrameMaker authors. Live, online demo:
http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-  Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.