TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
> The *really* interesting thing is how Adobe's algorithm
> differs from the Knuth-Plass algorithm. It must differ, since
> Adobe has managed to patent its algorithm (6,510,441).
Anyway, I hunted down a PDF copy of Adobe's line-breaking patent today.
Quite interesting reading indeed.
Adobe's algorithm differs from the Knuth-Plass algorithm in that the
former looks at the whole paragraph while the latter merely looks at
portions of the paragraph (these "portions" being defined in the patent
text). Adobe's argument in their patent is that an algorithm that looks
at the whole paragraph requires much more memory space and processing
time.
Which makes sense ofcourse, but it was interesting to read the whole
patent and and their discussion about the theory.
Best regards,
Mats Broberg
Technical Documentation Manager
www.flirthermography.com
WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT - EDIT AND REVIEW, REDEFINED
Accelerate the document lifecycle with full online discussions and unique feedback-management capabilities. Unlimited, efficient reviews for Word
and FrameMaker authors. Live, online demo: http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.