TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
-----Original Message-----
From: Amanda_Abelove
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 4:26 PM
Subject: RE: Just can't help myself
> QA would have been just fine with a good set of use case docs,
traceable
business and system requirements, and a well-written detailed design
doc.
In my case, the best feedback I've gotten has been from QA. I write up
the doc based on how something is *supposed* to work, then QA comes with
their feedback on how it actually works, and I'm already at *least* 75%
ahead of where I'd be if I let them just hand me their notes based off
the above mentioned docs and had to start from scratch. Plus, you get
early feedback on formatting/layout issues and the like that may have
tripped them up.
WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT - EDIT AND REVIEW, REDEFINED
Accelerate the document lifecycle with full online discussions and unique feedback-management capabilities. Unlimited, efficient reviews for Word
and FrameMaker authors. Live, online demo: http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.
