RE: system security (was: symbolize roles)

Subject: RE: system security (was: symbolize roles)
From: Lori Olcott <lori_olcott -at- yahoo -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 10:13:28 -0700 (PDT)


> .... I wasn't responding to your original post,
> but to another poster, who seemed to think that mentioning other
> capacities would raise security issues.

That's because it could indeed raise security issues in departments with a
"need to know" policy.

However, in Kevin's case, it seems to be a moot concern.



____________________________________________________
Yahoo! Sports
Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy Football
http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

Doc-To-Help 2005 now has RoboHelp Converter and HTML Source: Author
content and configure Help in MS Word or any HTML editor. No
proprietary editor! *August release. http://www.componentone.com/TECHWRL/DocToHelp2005

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



References:
RE: system security (was: symbolize roles): From: Bruce Byfield

Previous by Author: RE: system security (was: symbolize roles)
Next by Author: Re: Tech writers with typewriters?
Previous by Thread: RE: system security (was: symbolize roles)
Next by Thread: RE: system security (was: symbolize roles)


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads