Re: Updated documentation?

Subject: Re: Updated documentation?
From: "diotima" <diotima -at- myway -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 15:24:17 -0400 (EDT)



i was a bit hasty in my response to this. i was reacting to gene's first sentence and also not realizing that his was a response to something david had said.



but what i said doesn't really contradict the good points that gene makes. my emphasis is simply on taking the initiative to get it done.



at conglomocorp, you can call someone who will come and plug in your computer if you accidently kick the cord out. at a start-up, you gotta crawl under your desk yourself. and if you don't know how to do it, you'd better learn, or tidy up your resume.



-diotima









--- On Thu 07/21, Gene Kim-Eng < techwr -at- genek -dot- com > wrote:

From: Gene Kim-Eng [mailto: techwr -at- genek -dot- com]

To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 07:41:29 -0700

Subject: Re: Updated documentation?



<br>This is not a decision for a tech writer to make, nor even for the<br>company's tech pubs manager, if there is one, but rather one for<br>the company's policymakers (which, hopefully, include someone<br>from tech pubs). The sending out of materials that have not been <br>prepared or reviewed according to the company's established<br>processes carries a higher level of risk, both of technical error and<br>that critical company IP that ought not to be handed out to external<br>viewers is being released. It also represents a broader issue of<br>company policies and processes being willfully violated that may<br>someday come back to bite the company on its bottom in ISO or<br>SOX audits. The fact that the engineer does not face consequences<br>for going around the process may indicate that the company is<br>willing to accept that risk in the name of customer responsiveness,<br>or it may indicate that the company is in chaos, and only someone <br>who is there on a
day-to-day basis can tell for sure.<br><br>Gene Kim-Eng<br><br><br>----- Original Message ----- <br>From: "David Neeley" <dbneeley -at- gmail -dot- com><br><br>Allow me to make strong endorcement for Geoff's observation that the<br>engineer's response was appropriate and should be encouraged.

_______________________________________________
No banners. No pop-ups. No kidding.
Make My Way your home on the Web - http://www.myway.com



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

Doc-To-Help 2005 now has RoboHelp Converter and HTML Source: Author
content and configure Help in MS Word or any HTML editor. No
proprietary editor! *August release. http://www.componentone.com/TECHWRL/DocToHelp2005

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: Re: Updated documentation?
Next by Author: Re: Apple permits "then" to be used as a coord. conjunction in instructions?
Previous by Thread: Re: Updated documentation?
Next by Thread: Camtasia output to DVD


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads