Re: Professionalism on lists
You're correct in observing that it's not a one side's right/one side's wrong issue. Obviously, it's up to individuals to determine in which light they would like to be viewed. But really, as professionals I suspect it is prudent for each of us to put our best foot forward.
I must concur, particularly when I consider that potential employers can use Google and other tools to uncover one's trail of listserv participation.
In the words of either Michael Flanders or Donald Swann: "Hallo, Posterity!" [http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/alabaster/A658857]
--Guy K. Haas
Software Exegete in Silicon Valley
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
Doc-To-Help 2005 converts RoboHelp files with one click. Author with Word or any HTML editor. Visit our site to see a conversion demo movie and learn more. http://www.componentone.com/TECHWRL/DocToHelp2005
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.
References:
Professionalism on lists: From: Dana Worley
Previous by Author:
Re: "a SQL sever" vs "an SQL server"
Next by Author:
Exercise to get participants involved
Previous by Thread:
Re: Professionalism on lists
Next by Thread:
RE: Professionalism on lists
Search our Technical Writing Archives & Magazine
Visit TechWhirl's Other Sites
Sponsored Ads