RE: is "technologies" a word?

Subject: RE: is "technologies" a word?
From: "Downing, David" <DavidDowning -at- Users -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 11:00:54 -0400



Seems to me that the big, general, underlying question here is == where
do you draw the line between incorrect usage and normal linguistic
drift?

-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Byfield [mailto:bbyfield -at- axion -dot- net]
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 12:31 PM
Subject: Re: is "technologies" a word?

On Thu, 2005-29-09 at 12:15 +0100, Alessandro Ansa wrote:
> I would
> say that to preserve its proper meaning and usefulness, it ought to be
> used a little more carefully. I suppose we have a vested interest in
> this since our job titles are a derivative of the word - when
> technology becomes a vague term to describe anything from a mattress
to
> a trained dog, a technical writer is what exactly?
> sources and info.

And a technical writer's job description is concrete and unambiguous
now?

Buzzwords are silly by definition, but any attempt to combat them is
even sillier. You can't stop them, and they die off quickly on their
own. They should be avoided if you care about precision or freshness in
your language, but any greater reaction to them is more than they're
worth.

Personally, I find they appeal to my sense of the ridiculous. They're
entertaining enough that I wouldn't get rid of them even if I had the
power to do so.

--
Bruce Byfield 604-421-7177
http://members.axion.net/~bbyfield

"You bought all the props for a world that never was,
Now there's holes in the mirror, and less and less applause,
We are all ungrateful bastards, like a dog that bit your hand,
All these years and you still don't understand."
- OysterBand, "Too Late Now"
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Attention:
The information contained in this message and or attachments is intended
only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon,
this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient
is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and
delete the material from any system and destroy any copies.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
This email message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared
by NetIQ MailMarshal
_____________________________________________________________________________________

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

Doc-To-Help 2005 converts RoboHelp files with one click. Author with Word or any HTML editor. Visit our site to see a conversion demo movie and learn more. http://www.componentone.com/TECHWRL/DocToHelp2005

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: RE: is "technologies" a word?
Next by Author: Re: Resume Building
Previous by Thread: Re: is "technologies" a word?
Next by Thread: Re: Versioning repository for docs, w/ minor open source theme


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads