TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Thanks for your (below) very informative response.
You stated:
"Structured FrameMaker limits the ability of
individual
authors to get creative with the company style."
My comment and a question:
On a past TW assignment, I had edited/rewrote alot of
procedures written by network engineers. As the job
was at a DOD agency, we had a standard format/style.
However, that format/style was often violated. In
correcting these situations, I noted that the reason
for such violations was almost always the same:
Getting creative with the format/style was an easy way
for the writer to mask "holes" in his/her
understanding of the subject at hand (i.e, if I do not
fully understand the subject, then a way around the
situation is to "modify" the style so that it fits
what I do know).
Is not such modifying the style on-the-fly such a
wide-spread issue that structured Framemaker is bound
to be of limited use?
I moved from Interleaf to structured FrameMaker inan
environment that produces a huge amount of docs from
many departments for multiple products. They have a
legitimate desire for the hundreds of docs to have a
simliar look and feel to their presentation.
Structured FrameMaker limits the ability of individual
authors to get creative with the company style.
After a couple of years of using structured FM, I was
given a unstructured FM doc to make some major
changes.
I gave up using unstructured FM and converted it to
structured. I was too well versed in structured and
the lack of it was too frustrating. I knew how to get
what was needed in the structured environment, but not
in unstructured.
So the answer is, from a training perspective, authors
need to learn both.
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
Doc-To-Help 2005 now has RoboHelp Converter and HTML Source: Author
content and configure Help in MS Word or any HTML editor. No
proprietary editor! *August release. http://www.componentone.com/TECHWRL/DocToHelp2005
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-