RE: Don Norman on Manual Writing

Subject: RE: Don Norman on Manual Writing
From: "Dan Goldstein" <DGoldstein -at- riverainmedical -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:33:14 -0500

OK, so far we've established that in Bill's experience, analysis and
design are *never* separated, whereas in Tony's experience, they
*always* are.

We might possibly conclude that there is more than one correct way to
get from point A to point B. If so, perhaps the only error here is the
use of the word "inevitably."

-- Dan Goldstein

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tony Markos
> Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 1:25 PM
> To: Bill Swallow
> Cc: TECHWR-L
> Subject: Re: Don Norman on Manual Writing
>
> Analysis is a discovery process; design is not.
>
> Business Analysts and Requirements Analysts are a
> couple of examples of people who do analysis - but not
> design. In the organizations that I have worked in,
> BAs and RAs were not part of the design group.
>
> Much more important than missed/dropped details in
> transfer from analysis to design is the problem of
> short-circuited analysis, which inevitably happens
> when (true) analysts are under the same management as
> the design folks.
>
> Tony Markos
>
>
> --- Bill Swallow wrote:
>
> > When would analysis and design be separate?
> >
> > Every company I've worked or consulted for had both
> > efforts within a
> > project team. Spreading them out to separate groups
> > proved to be
> > costly as the analysis work didn't have direct
> > insight into design and
> > vice versa. The results of separate efforts were
> > missed details and
> > detached/disassociated/otherwise less than ideal
> > results.

This message contains confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the addressee, or the person responsible for delivering it to the addressee, you are hereby notified that reading, disseminating, distributing, copying, electronic storing or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message by mistake, please notify us, by replying to the sender, and delete the original message immediately thereafter. Thank you.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

Doc-To-Help 2005 now has RoboHelp Converter and HTML Source: Author
content and configure Help in MS Word or any HTML editor. No
proprietary editor! *August release. http://www.componentone.com/TECHWRL/DocToHelp2005

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40infoinfocus.com

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: RE: not an artifact, just a document
Next by Author: RE: RoboHelp Baby
Previous by Thread: RE: Don Norman on Manual Writing
Next by Thread: RE: Don Norman on Manual Writing


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads