TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: The Technical Writer vs. Agile Development Methodologies
Subject:Re: The Technical Writer vs. Agile Development Methodologies From:Tracy Taylor <ipsque -at- yahoo -dot- com> To:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com, bonnie -dot- turner -at- oracle -dot- com Date:Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:18:26 -0800 (PST)
--- A <aurora -at- identicloak -dot- com> wrote:
The fallacy of Agile is that software can
> be made so that
> it requires no documentation.
I don't think that's a correct assumption about Agile
methodologies. The principle is that developers value
working software over complete documentation, meaning
functional and technical requirements - they'd rather
have software that works than spend time writing
designs. The main complaint about this for writers is
that they have to spend more time than usual in
meetings and absorbing information from conversations
developers have around them to get the information
they need.
I think Agile has very little to say about user
documentation or implementation guides. I managed a
documentation group that worked with a team using
Agile methods and we never found articles or books
about how writers use Agile issues.
Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l