TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
While I have no experience with guru.com, elance.com and
workaholics4hire.com have both been getting some good press. I suggest you
explore those places instead if guru.com is as bad as it sounds.
Juho Tunkelo
> -----Original Message-----
> From: techwr-l-bounces+juho=metadoc -dot- fi -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com [mailto:techwr-
> l-bounces+juho=metadoc -dot- fi -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On Behalf Of Peter Neilson
> Sent: 15. helmikuuta 2006 2:25
> To: Jennifer C. Bennett
> Cc: TECHWR-L
> Subject: Re: Guru.com
>
> I am signed up with guru, using their "free" service, not paying to be a
> preferred vendor or whatever. For the most part, the jobs that show up
> are so imprecise as to defy bidding. I submit for maybe two or three a
> year, and have never had any response from the clients.
>
> Here's one I didn't bid on:
>
> ] Title: Need a Nutritional (Supplement) Expert
> ] Category: Writing / Editing / Translation
> ] Description:
> ] Need a nutritional expert to develop four six-week supplement guides
> ] programs for dieting and health maintenance for four different times
> ] of the year.
> ]
> ] The nutritional expert will be given payment after work is completed
> ] or partial, depending if the nutritional expert wants royalties and
> ] recognition on the final product.
> ]
> ] Further details will be given to the qualified winner.
>
> It makes me glad I'm not an expert in that field.
>
> I saw one guru RFQ that contained the following lament: "I have been
> so disappointed with GURU's attempting to get this work, it is
> amazing. I am trying again! I am looking for someone to peak my
> interest. The press releases need to cut through the clutter, and so
> far...I have only received very generic replies." This person, who is
> willing to pay $70 per release, is clearly in need of a writer.
> (Anyone trying to 'peak' an interest needs an editor at least!) I can
> see that if they had a staff writer working at $60,000, the person
> might be able to toss off two press releases an hour, and the naively
> perceived hourly cost would look like $30/release. But to come in out
> of the blue and do them at $70 each? How long might it take? Maybe
> two weeks to come up to speed on their actual requirements? Then
> maybe a day per release of back-and-forth to get them worded
> correctly? Sounds like $30/day to me!!! Slightly below my going
> rate.
>
>
> Here's another:
>
> ] Title: IT SupporContract Proposal Tech. Writing
> ] Category: Writing / Editing / Translation
> ] Description:
> ] Need someone that can interperate network, server, hardware and
> ] software information on an RFP and write the technical response
> ] to deliverables. Probably on the order of 5 pages of test. Subjects
> ] will be: Help Desk support, Unix/Windows Administration, Network
> ] Administration (routers/switches/firewall).
>
> Perhaps there is money to be made in helping guru's clients build
> good RFQs. The originator intended to say "interpret" and "text".
>
> When bidding on guru, one is supposed to make a total-cost, fixed-price
> quote, IIRC. There is the temptation to low-ball just to get the
> job. and then to try to squeeze in added costs, but that's not
> something I'd want to try. Once I found one job that I was sure I could
> do, but it was so flaky that I bid way high just to make sure I
> wouldn't get trapped. Never heard from them.
>
> It's my opinion that guru's clients are cheapskates who see spending
> more than a trifling amount of money on tech writing as being wasteful.
> If they were for real they would hire a writer or contract with a
> tech-writing company.
>
> My advice about guru? Not worth the trouble of even bidding.
>
> Jennifer C. Bennett wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > Has anyone here used Guru.com to find freelance technical writing work?
> > If anyone has any experiences to share, good or bad, please let me know.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
> format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
> delivery. Try it today!. http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
>
> Doc-To-Help includes a one-click RoboHelp project converter. It's that
> easy. Watch the demo at http://www.componentone.com/TECHWRL/DocToHelp2005
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as juho -at- metadoc -dot- fi -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-
> l/juho%40metadoc.fi
>
> To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
> Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today!. http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l