TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Tolerance in text From:"Gene Kim-Eng" <techwr -at- genek -dot- com> To:<eric -dot- dunn -at- ca -dot- transport -dot- bombardier -dot- com> Date:Wed, 22 Feb 2006 07:51:59 -0800
The danger can occur in both cases...
The first company I worked for out of school (as an engineer, not a
writer) had a prototype shop that tested the engineers' designs before
taking them to manufacture. The guys in the shop would frequently
send back drawings with comments about the tolerances (too tight,
too loose, could be tighter, etc.), and their comments were based on
their years of experience in "shop folklore." The next company did
not have such a shop in-house, *and* contracted most of their
machining to outside shops, most of which were not specialists "in
that industry." My experiences dealing with my previous employer's
prototype machinists helped me avoid the kinds of errors that often
occurred when other engineers who lacked that background sent out
drawings with inadequate or improper tolerances and the shops
either "implied" tolerances based on drawing units or blindly followed
tolerances that their "shop folklore" told them were bogus instead of
sending back questions about what tolerances were actually required.
If accuracy is your goal, "implication" = "assumption," and you know
what "assume" makes out of "u" and "me."
Gene Kim-Eng
----- Original Message -----
From: <eric -dot- dunn -at- ca -dot- transport -dot- bombardier -dot- com>
Only danger is when the shop hands refuse to abandon shop folklore for
engineering demands. But, then again, shop folklore often trumps
engineering theory.
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today!. http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
Doc-To-Help includes a one-click RoboHelp project converter. It's that easy. Watch the demo at http://www.componentone.com/TECHWRL/DocToHelp2005