TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
> I guess it all comes down to a matter of definitions. I, for one, feel
> that the word rhetoric has pejorized far more than it ever should
> have. It was once considered a high art, but someone along the way
> decided that rhetoric was manipulative or something. I'm not sure. Any
> one know for sure the history of the word? Fortunately, I had a
> teacher who once taught me the original meaning of the word. I think
> that is the definition that Joe was trying to convey.
>
That's why people who aspire to be technical communicators, or who are
already working in that capacity, should STUDY rhetoric in a formal way. You
do not get the same thing out of a semester's course as you get by reading
the dictionary. You read great stuff and you learn new things.
Also, how can technical documentation be said to be boring? To whom? A filet
mignon is boring to a man who's not hungry. When you are looking for an
answer to a question you have about software or your new digital piano,
aren't you quite interested in finding the answer?
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today!. http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l