TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Looks like you're both using a different definition of 'rhetoric'.
Given that, this discussion is pointless.
On 3/22/06, Tony Markos <ajmarkos -at- yahoo -dot- com> wrote:
> --- Me Too <klhra -at- yahoo -dot- com> wrote:
>
> ...the actual use of training in rhetoric would be
> applicable in only a small fraction of technical
> documents. After all, technical docs are almost never
> intended to influence ways of thought or persuade
> people on how to decide things.
>
> Tony Markos responds:
>
> I feel this way also, but I have been wrong before.
> Anyone care to estimate the percentage of time that
> rhetoric would "come into play" in a tech comm
> project?
--
Bill Swallow
HATT List Owner
WWP-Users List Owner
Senior Member STC, TechValley Chapter http://techcommdood.blogspot.com
============================
I support Char James-Tanny for STC Secretary.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today!. http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l