TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Why Gerunds? (Was: Overuse of gerunds in headings)
Subject:Why Gerunds? (Was: Overuse of gerunds in headings) From:Steven Brown <stevenabrown -at- yahoo -dot- com> To:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com Date:Wed, 5 Apr 2006 05:54:46 -0700 (PDT)
Hey now,
Will's question might prompt an interesting discussion
about why we insist on using gerunds in the first
place. Can we avoid gerunds and use more direct
language instead? Microsoft Word's TOC might look like
this:
Startup and Settings
Create a Document
View and Navigate a Document
Format a Document
Work with Text
Struggle with Autonumbering
Work with Graphics
Print a Document
It seems to me, these headings speak directly to the
reader (a good example of a more "engaging" or
"conversational" style that some of us advocate),
which I think is our intention as writers.
Steven Brown
P.S. As a side note, in a prior job, I inherited
responsibility for a manual whose headings looked
something like this:
How to Open an Account
How to Change an Address
How to Change Investment Choices
How to Close an Account
Ugh!
--- William Turner <wturner -at- force10networks -dot- com>
wrote:
> Whirlers,
>
> I have worked in several Pubs departments where the
> standard heading
> style was defined as requiring gerunds. That works
> fine for me when the
> subject is Installing, Configuring,
> Restoring...stuff like that.
>
> However, for an introductory chapter or section, am
> I breaking a
> well-established standard by calling it, for
> example, "Introduction
> to..." or "Overview of..."? I usually see, in
> similar situations, that
> the author uses "Understanding ..." in order to
> conform to gerund
> orthodoxy. For some unknown reason, that
> "Understanding ..." bugs me.
>
> -- Will
> ~~~~~~~
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support
> for every major Help
> format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise,
> and efficient content
> delivery. Try it today!.
>http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
>
> Doc-To-Help includes a one-click RoboHelp project
> converter. It's that easy. Watch the demo at
>http://www.componentone.com/TECHWRL/DocToHelp2005
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as
> stevenabrown -at- yahoo -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> or visit
> http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/stevenabrown%40yahoo.com
>
> To subscribe, send a blank email to
> techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
> Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
> Visit
>http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more
> resources and info.
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today!. http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l