TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
I have to wonder how effective the Microsoft solution really is in actual
practice. I mean, it would be an awfully labor intensive task to take the
time to analyze each of these that came in and correlate it with the
appropriate help topic. Particularly if it were used frequently. I guess
I've always taken the stance that this was put into place more to allow
frustrated users to get a "warm fuzzy" that Bill Gates himself might
actually viewing each and every one of these that gets submitted and
cracking the whip on the developers and documenters to straighten things up
pronto. Of course we all know that reality is probably far from that scene.
;) Who knows? Maybe they really DO use the feedback. Maybe that's how Clippy
was born. Gee, if only I could have a talking paper clip ask me endless
questions that don't seem to be related to what I'm really trying to do
here!
I think it also will depend on your audience. I come from experience with a
call center environment. In this environment, if half a second can somehow
be shaved off call time, that's what you want to do. The poor souls that
staff these environs are measured this way. So you can only imagine how
effective and useful such a feedback mechanism would be in this situation.
Hmmm, I'm already 2 minutes over my "limit" for this call, do I spend
another minute or so filling out the feedback and risk another "talk" about
my slipping performance level with my supervisor?
Just a thought. I know it all depends on the audience. ;)
Since I had so much great feedback from my last query (about error
messaging standards), I thought I'd quiz you kind folks again.
We're going to revamp our feedback system for our online help. Currently
we assign a URL to a button at the bottom of each help topic. Clicking
the button opens a new window with a bunch of questions and a Submit
button. Then someone else in our group puts the feedback in a
spreadsheet. We've gotten very little feedback over the course of a year
with our online help system.
Plus, we've abandoned the unique URL in most recent help topics because
we ran out of numbers (to tack onto the end of the URL) and nobody
seemed to know how to get more. This method was way too much work. We
also recognize that our feedback form was way too long.
Does anyone have any good feedback examples that they've seen or
implemented themselves? I do like Microsoft's "Was this helpful" yes or
no and then you write a little text why and hit submit.
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today!. http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
Doc-To-Help includes a one-click RoboHelp project converter. It's that easy. Watch the demo at http://www.componentone.com/TECHWRL/DocToHelp2005