TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: [WAS] Move from Ventura to FrameMaker wise? [IS NOW] Save as vs. Print to PDF
Subject:Re: [WAS] Move from Ventura to FrameMaker wise? [IS NOW] Save as vs. Print to PDF From:"Yves Barbion" <yves -dot- barbion -at- gmail -dot- com> To:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com, frame2acrobat -at- yahoogroups -dot- com Date:Tue, 11 Apr 2006 10:11:24 +0200
Hello Schlomo,
yes, I am aware of the issues with "Save as PDF" from FrameMaker, but I
haven't had any of them yet (and I even have to create Enfocus Certified
PDFs). Of course, two things are crucial in the Frame-to-PDF process:
- Correct settings of the Adobe PDF printer driver instance
- Correct Adobe PDF Settings (formerly known as Job Options) in
Acrobat Distiller
I'm following Dov's recommendations here, which may be the reason why I
didn't have any problems. ;-)
One thing which still puzzles me about the Frame-to-PDF process: the
difference in speed. I did the test with a 100-page FrameMaker book:
- Print to PDF took 5 minutes (especially the Distiller part, PS to
PDF, was "slow").
- Save as PDF took 1 minute.
Can you explain what's happening "behind the scenes"? Indeed, like you said,
FrameMaker does not produce native PDF.
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today!. http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l