TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: "+" sign in a navigation tree From:"Ron Hearn" <RHearn -at- cucbc -dot- com> To:"Bill Swallow" <techcommdood -at- gmail -dot- com>, <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Fri, 16 Jun 2006 14:40:44 -0700
I ended up using the + symbol as it appeared on the interface in my
document as in "click on the +...". I believe the term replicant came
from the development platform the developers were using where it was
referred to as that by the platform's documentation, which would have
been techie, developer-oriented docs.
ron
-----Original Message-----
From: techwr-l-bounces+rhearn=cucbc -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
[mailto:techwr-l-bounces+rhearn=cucbc -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On Behalf
Of Bill Swallow
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 1:36 PM
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: Re: "+" sign in a navigation tree
Back end terminology and UI terminology are not synonymous. Replicant
is not valid, though. Perhaps they were just up late watching Blade
Runner. Or perhaps they were just dismissing you playfully. ;-)
None of which has anything to do with how they write documentation.
I know many developers who write fantastic documentation...
But just becuase developers call it something doesn't mean that's
what you should tell Joe User it is. After all, you don't go calling
screens, windows, and dialogs "WinForms", do you?
Maybe the developer was answering your question while expecting you to
do your job by equating what a replicant does to something a user
would understand?
;-)
After all, a Replicant is a "Skin-Job"... (I'll let you think about
that as it pertains to UI design...)
Ha!!! [=OP
On 6/16/06, Pageologist <pageology -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:
> On 6/16/06, Ron Hearn <RHearn -at- cucbc -dot- com> wrote:
> >
> > The word that I've heard developers use for it is "replicant" which
> > sounds like something from a bad Sci-Fi movie.
>
> Yet another example of why developers should not write documentation.
--
Bill Swallow
HATT List Owner
WWP-Users List Owner
Senior Member STC, TechValley Chapter http://techcommdood.blogspot.com
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today!. http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l