TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
RE: Dropping the you? The Asian response to imperative voice. (was: Re: you or he/it)
Subject:RE: Dropping the you? The Asian response to imperative voice. (was: Re: you or he/it) From:"Diana Ost" <Diana -dot- Ost -at- msmcorp -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Fri, 23 Jun 2006 09:06:26 -0400
How about this for a rewrite? I would normally put this in an If..Then
table, side by side, but you get the idea. It is still present tense and
active voice.
If system configuration is for mostly...
- One centralized facility
Then the recommendation is to...
- Use the client-server configuration
If system configuration is for...
- Several remote facilities
Then the recommendation is to...
- Use the client server configuration with:
- modification one
- modification two
My company prefers not to use "you" or "we" in policies and in most
procedures. It is what they are used to, so I get to be creative. :-)
Mostly I use the imperative voice in instructions (Click this...), but I
am not currently doing work that will be translated for Pacific Rim
countries, such as Japan. I have in the past, however, and believe the
postings here are very accurate about writing and translating for a
Japanese audience.
Diana Ost
Technical Writer/Reporting Analyst
Production Administration
Market Street Mortgage Corporation
diana -dot- ost -at- msmcorp -dot- com
Phone (727) 431-7209
Fax (727) 724-9096
2650 McCormick Drive, Suite 200
Clearwater, Florida 33759
This message and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged
information and are only for the intended recipient of this message. If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by return
email or phone, and delete or destroy this and all copies of this
message and all attachments. Any unauthorized disclosure, use,
distribution, or reproduction of this message or any attachments is
prohibited and may be unlawful.
-----Original Message-----
From: techwr-l-bounces+diana -dot- ost=msmcorp -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
[mailto:techwr-l-bounces+diana -dot- ost=msmcorp -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On
Behalf Of Monica Cellio
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 10:13 PM
To: TECHWR-L
Subject: Re: Dropping the you? The Asian response to imperative voice.
(was: Re: you or he/it)
> Sean Hower noted: <<no one has suggested that you could simply adopt a
> style that uses neither you nor the user. That would eliminate this
> entire discussion. For example: You can use the color picker to set
> the background of your pages. can be rewritten as Use the color picker
> to set the background color for pages.>>
The imperative can work well for direct, procedural material. I'm
having trouble imagining how it would work when writing more open-ended
documentation, such as when giving advice about the alternatives
available to the reader. How would you rewrite something like this (in
a sys-admin or programming manual)? "If most of your users are located
in one facility, we recommend using the standard client-server
configuration. If most of your users are in remote locations, or if any
have slow or unreliable network connections, we instead recommend using
the multi-server configuration with the following modifications [...]."
I generally find the second person to be the least-awkward approach,
even when writing for translation. But I also take to heart the
comments about negative feedback being hard to get; thanks for the tip.
Monica Cellio
Senior SDK Developer
I don't represent my company (which is why I don't name it).
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today!. http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today!. http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l