Re: Hiring Discrimination

["Bill Swallow" <techcommdood -at- gmail -dot- com>]

While your reasoning is right on the money, specifically asking a
question about starting a family and its impact on productivity is a
question to avoid. It's not an illegal question to ask, but asking a
candidate any question with regard to pregnancy is a liability that
can result in court action. It's then up to the court to determine
liability. Regardless of how we may validate our questions, we as
interviewers need to remember that any question is subject to
interpretation and also subject to litigation. The further we stray
from the job in our questioning, the more liable we become.

Taboo topics:
* birthplace, nationality, ancestry, descent
* sex or marital status
* race or color
* religion
* physical disabilities or handicaps
* health or medical history
* pregnancy, birth control, or child care

We can ask questions that get to the heart of the matter, but we can't
ask within the above contexts without risking liability. For example,
you can say "can you lift up to 40 lbs" (and yes, this is a common job
requirement even in a tech industry) but you cannot frame it in
context of a handicap. Likewise, you can say "The job requires you to
be on-site for a standard 40 hour work week. Our official office hours
are from 8:30 to 5:30. Can you work the required hours" but you cannot
frame it in the context of a health or pregnancy inquiry.

College students are taught this. HR training enforces this.

On 10/2/06, Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com> wrote: