TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Showing sample and proprietary content From:Joe Malin <jmalin -at- jmalin -dot- com> To:Sean Wheller <sean -at- inwords -dot- co -dot- za> Date:Fri, 20 Oct 2006 16:09:28 -0700
Dear Sean,
Not a poor choice of words, as much as a conflict between the noun
"domain" modified by the adjective "public" and the term "public
domain". Unfortunately, the latter is commonly used in US copyright law
to refer to a specific concept that is different from your meaning. I
can't speak for copyright law in other countries.
This works itself back into a related thread about using domain-specific
terminology. One has to be careful. For example, in the Java web
application world, the term "component" has a specific and non-intuitive
meaning. One can not use it as a generic term for part of a larger system.
Similarly, in the technical writing world, one must take care when using
the term "public domain". I follow technical writing, digital rights
management, and copy protection issues quite closely, so "public domain"
is an immediate trigger for a particular concept. In pointing this out,
I only want to ensure that my readers understand the difference between
publicly available and "public domain." It is an important *legal*
difference.
I am sorry that all of this landed on your head.
To the original point of discussion: I provide samples of parts of
publicly available material. I make sure that the copyright is stated. I
think that this falls under reasonable use.
I do not provide samples of confidential material unless I have
permission from the company that has ownership of it.
Joe
Sean Wheller wrote:
> On Friday 20 October 2006 21:58, Joe Malin wrote:
>
>> I respectfully disagree.
>>
>> Here is a Wikipedia article on public domain:
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_domain
>>
>
> OK OK :-) sigh
>
> Before another person points out my poor choice of words, here is alink to
> what my intent was in using domain.
>
>http://wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=domain
>
> ho boy.
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
Easily create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to any popular Help file format or printed documentation. Learn more at http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-