TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: The term "functionality" From:"Ron Hearn" <RHearn -at- cucbc -dot- com> To:<techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Thu, 26 Oct 2006 09:57:58 -0700
I am not a big fan of functionality and use function or feature whenever
I can, as Gene suggests. Still "functionality" seems pervasive in all
marketing and development documents that are outside my sphere of
influence.
Ron
-----Original Message-----
From: techwr-l-bounces+rhearn=cucbc -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
[mailto:techwr-l-bounces+rhearn=cucbc -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On Behalf
Of Gene Kim-Eng
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 9:47 AM
To: mailinfodd-wrt -at- yahoo -dot- com; techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: Re: The term "functionality"
I think it falls into the same category as "utilize."
It's a real word with a real meaning, but is so
frequently misused that depending on your
situation it may be best not do anything that
might encourage others to use it.
In most cases, "function" or "feature" can be
substituted with less risk of malapropism..
Gene Kim-Eng
----- Original Message -----
From: "M. Palmieri" <mailinfodd-wrt -at- yahoo -dot- com>
To: <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 7:44 AM
Subject: The term "functionality"
> Any opinions about using the term "functionality" --
> or not?
>
> Certain audiences seems to have a strong aversion to
> the term, others not so much.
>
> Are there alternative terms that you prefer?
Easily create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to any popular
Help file format or printed documentation. Learn more at http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as RHearn -at- cucbc -dot- com -dot-
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
Easily create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to any popular Help file format or printed documentation. Learn more at http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-