TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
RE: Tech Spec vs Functional Spec was RE: What are you working on?
Subject:RE: Tech Spec vs Functional Spec was RE: What are you working on? From:Richard Lewis <tech44writer -at- yahoo -dot- com> To:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com Date:Thu, 9 Nov 2006 11:53:06 -0800 (PST)
Hi all:
Thanks for the informative responses. Basic concensous: Functional Specs state what the system will do and Techical Specs states how the system will do it. That makes sense; I now kind of wonder why I asked the question in the first place.
I guess what threw me is that it has been my experience that Technical Specs are most often created without Functional Specs first being created. Which, when you think about it, is like the analysts saying "We don't know what we are going to do, but we are going to use solutions x,y and z to do it".
Thanks,
Richard Lewis
---------------------------------
Access over 1 million songs - Yahoo! Music Unlimited.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
Easily create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to any popular Help file format or printed documentation. Learn more at http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-