RE: Techie's List

Subject: RE: Techie's List
From: "James Barrow" <vrfour -at- verizon -dot- net>
To: <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 22:19:31 -0800

>Fred Ridder said:
>
>So Jim, are you saying that you were not the person who said "They would
>have to prove a) a post to this website was actually a crime"?

I did indeed post that.

>And for the record, the one and only place in the thread where the words
>"crime" or "criminal" were used in any posting to the list was in a message
>from Janice Gelb where she was directly quoting from an item on a case law
>website. The word "criminal" did appear in the quotation, but the whole
>point of the quotation was that a specific statute in Illinois had been
>interpreted by the state's supreme court as part of criminal libel law
>[rather than civil libel law] and therefore subject to issues of intent and
>purpose rather than simply the truth or falseness of the statement.

The link that Janice posted talked about a defense to a charge of criminal
libel. Going on that, I looked up Criminal Libel which, in some states, is
a Class 6 Felony:

http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/analysis.aspx?id=17263

Then I found a link where this archaic law was recently enforced:

http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/commentary.aspx?id=12468

"All that changed in 1964, when the U.S. Supreme Court concluded that public
officials (later broadened to include public figures) could not win a libel
verdict or secure a criminal-libel conviction without proving that the
report was made with "actual malice," and either published with the
knowledge that it was untrue or done with a reckless disregard for the
truth."

In reference to the Techie List, the subject of a poor rating would have to
prove actual malice to support a charge of criminal libel. But, in my haste
to get to my lunch, I didn't map out the happy path from Janice's link to my
comment. I apologize.

>So as far as the thread itself goes, you *were* the first (and only) person
>to state or imply that libel was a crime. Check the list archive if you
>think I'm wrong.

Nope, I believe you.

- Jim


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include single source authoring, team authoring,
Web-based technology, and PDF output. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList

Now shipping: Help &amp; Manual 4 with RoboHelp(r) import! New editor,
full Unicode support. Create help files, web-based help and PDF in up
to 106 languages with Help &amp; Manual: http://www.helpandmanual.com

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40infoinfocus.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


References:
RE: Techie's List: From: Fred Ridder

Previous by Author: RE: Techie's List
Next by Author: Re: File conversions -- too good to be true?
Previous by Thread: RE: Techie's List
Next by Thread: RE: Techie's List


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads