TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Simplified English (was:RE: Something a little more useful than: RE: Pet Peeves)
Subject:Simplified English (was:RE: Something a little more useful than: RE: Pet Peeves) From:"Steve Cavanaugh" <scavanaugh -at- nat-seattle -dot- com> To:"Chris Borokowski" <athloi -at- yahoo -dot- com>, <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:48:13 -0800
Yes, a resource. I've found that standard to be helpful in many ways,
not the least of which is to cause me to think about my audience, and
whether the words I've chosen have the appropriate meaning in the
reader's context. Thanks for pointing that out.
Steve Cavanaugh
Sr. Technical Writer
NAT Seattle Inc.
-----Original Message-----
From: techwr-l-bounces+scavanaugh=nat-seattle -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
[mailto:techwr-l-bounces+scavanaugh=nat-seattle -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com]
On Behalf Of Chris Borokowski
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 9:37 AM
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: RE: Something a little more useful than: RE: Pet Peeves
Good point. It shouldn't replace all English. But spoken English is a
subset of Standard English, and breaks down into different dialects by
region and nation and function. Plain Language and/or Simplified English
is one standard.
Your sentiment is one that many here will share, which is that we do not
want to be required to write in a limited language. That's why the
original poster recommended it as a resource, not a standard. I think.
--- Fred Ridder <docudoc -at- hotmail -dot- com> wrote:
> One sentence stands out in that Wikipedia article you cite:
>
> "It [Simplified English] is not intended for use as a general writing
> standard."
________________________________________________________________________
____________
TV dinner still cooling?
Check out "Tonight's Picks" on Yahoo! TV. http://tv.yahoo.com/
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats
or
printed documentation. Features include single source authoring, team
authoring,
Web-based technology, and PDF output. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
Now shipping: Help & Manual 4 with RoboHelp(r) import! New editor,
full Unicode support. Create help files, web-based help and PDF in up
to 106 languages with Help & Manual: http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as scavanaugh -at- nat-seattle -dot- com -dot-
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include single source authoring, team authoring,
Web-based technology, and PDF output. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
Now shipping: Help & Manual 4 with RoboHelp(r) import! New editor,
full Unicode support. Create help files, web-based help and PDF in up
to 106 languages with Help & Manual: http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-