RE: Standard WinHelp vs. WinHelp 2000

Subject: RE: Standard WinHelp vs. WinHelp 2000
From: "Dan Goldstein" <DGoldstein -at- riverainmedical -dot- com>
To: <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 11:34:44 -0400

My previous company's help system was based on 16-bit WinHelp, and our
customers were happy with it. We don't use any online help at my current
company. At both companies, product installation is performed onsite by
our own staff, so downloading and installing a patch for 32-bit WinHelp
(if we ever needed it) wouldn't be a problem.

If I'm not mistaken, WinHelp 2000 (the reason for Keith's query)
requires the 32-bit engine. Or am I confusing that with RoboEx32.dll?

(As for our customers being "better," Candide had it right: All of our
customers are the best of all possible customers.)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brierley, Sean
> Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 11:13 AM
> To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> Subject: RE: Standard WinHelp vs. WinHelp 2000
>
> We have trouble getting all our customers to use one approved
> version of a single browser, so getting them individually to
> download and install the patch from Microsoft is unlikely to
> succeed. Maybe your customers are better...
>

This message contains confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the addressee, or the person responsible for delivering it to the addressee, you are hereby notified that reading, disseminating, distributing, copying, electronic storing or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message by mistake, please notify us, by replying to the sender, and delete the original message immediately thereafter. Thank you.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include single source authoring, team authoring,
Web-based technology, and PDF output. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList

Now shipping: Help &amp; Manual 4 with RoboHelp(r) import! New editor,
full Unicode support. Create help files, web-based help and PDF in up
to 106 languages with Help &amp; Manual: http://www.helpandmanual.com

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.


References:
Tech Writers & Educational Material: From: Grant Robertson
Re: Tech Writers & Educational Material: From: Milan Davidovic
Standard WinHelp vs. WinHelp 2000: From: Keith Hansen
RE: Standard WinHelp vs. WinHelp 2000: From: Brierley, Sean
RE: Standard WinHelp vs. WinHelp 2000: From: Dan Goldstein
RE: Standard WinHelp vs. WinHelp 2000: From: Brierley, Sean

Previous by Author: RE: Standard WinHelp vs. WinHelp 2000
Next by Author: Winhlp32.exe for Windows Vista
Previous by Thread: RE: Standard WinHelp vs. WinHelp 2000
Next by Thread: Re: Standard WinHelp vs. WinHelp 2000


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads