Re: Wording too dense? OK?

Subject: Re: Wording too dense? OK?
From: Peter Neilson <neilson -at- windstream -dot- net>
To: TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 07:28:21 -0400

I don't think our gathered minds are quite on target. The SME sees the
tech writer as unnecessary and ignorant, liable to introduce error in
any change that is made. Some of the changes that others have suggested
indeed introduce errors, thus providing support for the SME's belief!

What aspect of "Unix" is in use? It appears to be the assigning of
values to shell variables, which are the upper-case items. The SME is
overlooking issues of context:

- The shell in use. It's likely ksh. Google "man ksh" for more than
enough info. But maybe it's some other shell.
- Whether the variables are to be set as default (in /etc/profile) or
per login (in $HOME/.profile).
- The shell's syntax for setting (and for exporting) variables.

How should the non-Unix-educated tech writer approach the task? By
asking for examples.

BUT PERHAPS IT'S NOT UNIX AT ALL!

That something is named xxx.bat indicates that we are within the MS-DOS
(or Windows) environment, as does the pathname with backslashes (\) in it.

It's my belief that there is a major mismatch between the SME and the
tech writer. If I knew more about the situation I would probably suspect
that the tech writer is receiving disinformation, and that Scott Adams
could make good use of it all.

The actual problem would then be one of management, not tech writing.


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more.
http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList

True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.


Follow-Ups:

References:
FWD: Wording too dense? OK?: From: TECHWR-L Administrator
Re: Wording too dense? OK?: From: Susan W Gallagher

Previous by Author: Re: Cellular terminology
Next by Author: RE: My cropped graphics won't compress
Previous by Thread: Re: Wording too dense? OK?
Next by Thread: Re: Wording too dense? OK?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads