Re: 40-hour weeks (was Re: FWD: Lack...)

Subject: Re: 40-hour weeks (was Re: FWD: Lack...)
From: Chris Borokowski <athloi -at- yahoo -dot- com>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 12:25:16 -0700 (PDT)

True enough. However, I think it's clear that I never attacked anyone
for doing a good job that required more than 40 hours. If you read
back, the original poster talked about an office where 45+ hours was
the norm. My comment was that as a norm, this is not necessary, in any
job.

I can't see how anyone would object to that unless they're
pathologically inclined to see quantity of work as more important than
quality.

Having pulled more than my fair share of overtime, I consider it
required at times on every job. If the server crashes the night before
deadline, there's going to be an all-nighter. But on a regular basis?
If you're working more than 40 hours, it's from poor efficiency and/or
conditions, whether you chose these or not.

--- Mary Arrotti <mary_arrotti -at- yahoo -dot- com> wrote:

> I referred to people *rigidly holding* to 40-hour weeks. Again - in
> my experience - there are times when a job or project just can't get
> done in 40 hours - even by the most efficient & capable person. In
> that situation, if someone only works 40 hour weeks - something gets
> missed - either quality or the deadline.
>
> I've interviewed for more than one position where it's been stated
> that overtime *is required.* Having to work overtime is not uncommon
> for many people. This does not mean that those people are incapable
> or inefficient.
>
> The point is that very, very few people want to work more than 40
> hours a week. The reality is that many of us have to - our jobs and
> workloads (and sometimes pride & self-respect) require it.
>
>
> Chris Borokowski <athloi -at- yahoo -dot- com> wrote:
> I resent the accusation that 40-hour diehards work less. There are
> many
> of us who want to work efficiently and get out of the office. There
> was
> never in my statement any slight toward those who like to work more,
> only the statement that working more than 40 hours a week, bar
> emergencies, is not necessary.
>
> ---------------------------------
> Looking for a deal? Find great prices on flights and hotels with
> Yahoo! FareChase.


http://technical-writing.dionysius.com/
technical writing | consulting | development



____________________________________________________________________________________
Got a little couch potato?
Check out fun summer activities for kids.
http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=summer+activities+for+kids&cs=bz
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more.
http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList

True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.


References:
Re: 40-hour weeks (was Re: FWD: Lack...): From: Mary Arrotti

Previous by Author: Re: 40-hour weeks (was Re: FWD: Lack...)
Next by Author: RE: FWD: Lack of self-awareness in a writer...what to do
Previous by Thread: Re: 40-hour weeks (was Re: FWD: Lack...)
Next by Thread: RE: 40-hour weeks (was Re: FWD: Lack...)


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads