TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
True enough. However, I think it's clear that I never attacked anyone
for doing a good job that required more than 40 hours. If you read
back, the original poster talked about an office where 45+ hours was
the norm. My comment was that as a norm, this is not necessary, in any
job.
I can't see how anyone would object to that unless they're
pathologically inclined to see quantity of work as more important than
quality.
Having pulled more than my fair share of overtime, I consider it
required at times on every job. If the server crashes the night before
deadline, there's going to be an all-nighter. But on a regular basis?
If you're working more than 40 hours, it's from poor efficiency and/or
conditions, whether you chose these or not.
--- Mary Arrotti <mary_arrotti -at- yahoo -dot- com> wrote:
> I referred to people *rigidly holding* to 40-hour weeks. Again - in
> my experience - there are times when a job or project just can't get
> done in 40 hours - even by the most efficient & capable person. In
> that situation, if someone only works 40 hour weeks - something gets
> missed - either quality or the deadline.
>
> I've interviewed for more than one position where it's been stated
> that overtime *is required.* Having to work overtime is not uncommon
> for many people. This does not mean that those people are incapable
> or inefficient.
>
> The point is that very, very few people want to work more than 40
> hours a week. The reality is that many of us have to - our jobs and
> workloads (and sometimes pride & self-respect) require it.
>
>
> Chris Borokowski <athloi -at- yahoo -dot- com> wrote:
> I resent the accusation that 40-hour diehards work less. There are
> many
> of us who want to work efficiently and get out of the office. There
> was
> never in my statement any slight toward those who like to work more,
> only the statement that working more than 40 hours a week, bar
> emergencies, is not necessary.
>
> ---------------------------------
> Looking for a deal? Find great prices on flights and hotels with
> Yahoo! FareChase.
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-