TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: Knowledge is manufactured? From:Yves JEAUROND <jingting -at- rogers -dot- com> To:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com Date:Fri, 3 Aug 2007 20:14:42 -0400 (EDT)
You know: knowledge
You know that you know: meta-knowledge.
If you call them both "knowledge" you get Russell's paradox
about sets. Is the set of all sets a set, and thus part of itself? :-)
Existence isn't a knowledge--sorry, Descartes.
It is something that one feels and observes in others.
Not something that one knows. Epistemology 101.
Lauren <lt34 -at- csus -dot- edu> a écrit :
> From: Gause_Brian -at- emc -dot- com
> More specifically, "information" is a building block of "knowledge",
> which is the result of conscious analysis. And both can be transmitted
> as information...All talk generates information. It is only with the
> mental work in your head that you create knowledge.
>
> Both of these words are nonsense in the context of my title,
> though. My
> expertise transcends this distinction between information and
> knowledge.
> I am a writer.
>
> Brian Gause
Well here's a theory of knowledge and existentialism.
How do you know what you know? All "knowledge" is a first-person account of
subjective perceptions. We call it "knowledge" when we can get another
person to confirm the contents of our heads by comparing our assessments.
If I say that I know that I exist, I can't prove it. I can say that I
believe that I exist and other people believe that I exist. The beliefs of
other people, like my own beliefs are based on subjective perceptions. We
can say that because we perceive someone else, then that person exists, but
confirming our perceptions against the perceptions of others is not proof
because the comparison is still subjective. I can only prove that I exist
if somebody objectively says that I exist because I cannot get outside of
myself to form that objective assessment. I can only objectively say that
somebody else exists if I can form an objective perception. I cannot form
an objective perception because I cannot get outside of myself. Therefore,
I cannot prove that somebody else exists and no one can prove that I exist.
I can only "know" something if I exist because we must exist to have
knowledge. I can't know if I exist, so I can't have knowledge.
Therefore, there is no knowledge, but, of course, I can write about it,
whatever *it* is.
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as jingting -at- rogers -dot- com -dot-
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
