TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
I have to agree with you up to a point -- that's the point where I remember
that there really is no such thing as "objectivity" in the human realm, and
simultaneity does not prove causality.
By the way, there is something very odd to me about...well, let me put it
this way: Do architects, for example, incessantly grouse about how they're
not respected?
> The Existential theory of knowledge is a Straw Man argument
> intended to
> confuse you. It is not "logically valid", and its conclusions are not
> "true" in any sense of that word. It does not account for Psychology,
> Neurobiology or anything we've learned about the brain over the past
> century. Today, with tools like CAT scans and MRIs, researchers can
> offer data that demonstrates the objective existence of a subjective
> thought as it happens in your head. Because your brain activity can be
> measured with scientific instruments, we have a tool,
> otherwise known as
> objective evidence, showing that your subjective thought did, in fact,
> exist. This gives new meaning to Descartes' "I think,
> therefore I am".
>
> Knowledge is where "perception" meets "reason". The act of saying you
> exist proves that you exist. It's really that simple.
>
> If you want to believe that you can't prove things exist, and
> specifically, that knowledge doesn't exist, you're welcome to believe
> it...but you're handicapping your rational faculties before you even
> begin.
>
> Again, this is not aimed at you, Lauren, but as a general
> "slap-down" of
> Existential theories of knowledge...which are just bogus and
> frustrating.
>
> When you base your beliefs on something other than "perception" and
> "reason", you end up as confused as an Existentialist...in
> Philosophical
> circles, existentialism is all but dead.
>
> Brian Gause
>
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-