TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
RE: Recent User Assistance Studies on Printed Books?
Subject:RE: Recent User Assistance Studies on Printed Books? From:Lorraine Kiewiet <lkiewiet -at- earthlink -dot- net> To:Fred Ridder <docudoc -at- hotmail -dot- com>, richard -dot- combs -at- Polycom -dot- com, techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com Date:Tue, 7 Aug 2007 13:15:05 -0400 (EDT)
Yes, I was just rounding. Just trying to contrast 8.5 x 11 spiral bound books with what I have on my bookshelf and what I've produced at other companies.
Thanks for the tips!
-----Original Message-----
>From: Fred Ridder <docudoc -at- hotmail -dot- com>
>Sent: Aug 7, 2007 11:58 AM
>To: richard -dot- combs -at- Polycom -dot- com, lkiewiet -at- earthlink -dot- net, techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>Subject: RE: Recent User Assistance Studies on Printed Books?
>
>I agree that 7.5" x 9" (190mm x 229mm) is not a common
>*page* size, but it is a fairly common *trim* size for
>soft-bound technical books. Although only a few titles on
>my software reference bookshelf are exactly 7.5" x 9"
>(e.g. Tom Neuberger's FrameMaker 5 book and a couple
>other Sybex titles) I found none that strayed from these
>dimensions by more than 1/2" in width or 3/4" in height.
>For example, most titles from Microsoft Press and Addison-
>Wesley were just a little narrower and a bit taller, while
>Adobe manuals are 7.5" wide but a bit more than 1/2"
>shorter than 9" (they seem to use a dimension that is
>not a round number in either inches or millimeters...).
>
>-Fred Ridder
>
>
>>From: "Combs, Richard" <richard -dot- combs -at- Polycom -dot- com>
>>To: "Lorraine Kiewiet" <lkiewiet -at- earthlink -dot- net>,
>><techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
>>Subject: RE: Recent User Assistance Studies on Printed Books?
>>Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 08:58:38 -0600
>>
>>Lorraine Kiewiet wrote:
>>
>> > Examples: for internationalization, we believe that the book
>> > should be 7.5 x 9. For readability, the body font should be
>> > serif, and more than 3 points of line leading are needed
>> > between paragraphs.
>>
>>For internationalization, the book should use an ISO page size, such as
>>B5 (176 x 250 mm, about 7 x 9 7/8"). An even inch size isn't likely to
>>be an international standard. I've never heard of 7.5 x 9" as a standard
>>page size in any country, and this list of traditional American sizes
>>doesn't include it:
>>
>>http://home.inter.net/eds/paper/papersize.html#na
>>
>>Europeans, we're told, prefer sans serif body text. Readability data is
>>inconclusive, I belief -- it probably depends on what you're used to and
>>a thousand other variables. Can't please everyone. ;-)
>>
>>Leading isn't the space between paragraphs, it's the space between
>>lines. The "right" amount of leading depends on the font and the line
>>width, but 20% of the point size is a good starting point, and generally
>>what FM, Word, etc., default to -- so 10-point text gets 2 points of
>>leading.
>>
>>The space between paragraphs needs to be significantly more than the
>>leading or you can't distinguish paragraphs. I'd recommend at least half
>>a line, so for 10-point text with 2-point leading (a 12-point line), at
>>least 6 points. For large line widths (wide text columns), more would be
>>better.
>>
>>As for folio numbering, I dislike it, and I think must users do, too (in
>>a 300-page book, where the heck is page 7-29?). You can make a case for
>>it if send out manuals in binders and issue revision pages (how 80s!).
>>I've heard it can save translation money in some workflows -- I'm
>>tempted to say change the workflow.
>>
>>YMMV, of course. :-)
>>
>>Richard
>>
>>
>>------
>>Richard G. Combs
>>Senior Technical Writer
>>Polycom, Inc.
>>richardDOTcombs AT polycomDOTcom
>>303-223-5111
>>------
>>rgcombs AT gmailDOTcom
>>303-777-0436
>>------
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>See what youÂre getting intoÂbefore you go there
>http://newlivehotmail.com/?ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_viral_preview_0507
>
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-