TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
> Is there a set standard or a preferred method with regard to
> using related
> topics and see also?
>
> Zen
According to the Microsoft Manual of Style, page 35, "Titles of "See Also"
sections can also vary. For example, such sections might be called "Related
Topics" or, for cross-references that are exclusively hyperlinks, "Related
Links.""
Personally, I have different connotations for "See Also" and "Related
Topics." "See Also" sounds like a different method for the same subject and
"Related Topics" sounds like a similar but different subject.
"See Also," "Related Topics," and "Related Links" are all titles for
cross-references, so it is probably best to be consistent and give them one
name.
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-