TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Rob Hudson wondered: <<I agree with you, Fred, that I could have done
Wikipedia and Google. However, I figured the expertise here would
give me a nice foundation from which to further research Dita.>>
And I agree with that approach. People here are more than willing to
share their expertise, and I always find the real-world stories more
helpful than the more theoretical reference material found in most
sites. That's particularly true for things like product comparisons.
<<Regarding Wikipedia: Can I trust it more than I can trust a list of
experts? Is it more valid for technical matters than for other types
of issues?>>
There was a study (last year?) that compared WikiPedia with the
esteemed Encyclopedia Britannica, and found them comparable in
accuracy overall. Didn't see the study firsthand (only saw the news
reports), so I can't say whether I trust the comparison. My own
experience with Wikipedia has been mixed, but getting better over the
years. Technical information tends to be less debatable than
sociological or cultural or historical information, but even there,
the "anyone can edit" nature of most wikis means that you have to be
careful using WikiPedia as a final source. No field is immune from
politics and tampering with the literature.
More importantly, one of the biggest lessons I learned in grad school
was the concept of triangulation: Everyone screws up occasionally*,
and some people screw up intentionally to support a prejudice or
political (in the broad sense) agenda. So always confirm important
facts from multiple sources. I use WikiPedia daily for a quick
reality check or refresher course, but keep my wits about me, look
for inconsistencies with my existing body of knowledge, and always
verify what I find through other sources when it's important that I
understand something thoroughly and correctly.
*In a good week, I _only_ screw up occasionally. Sigh.
----------------------------------------------------
-- Geoff Hart
ghart -at- videotron -dot- ca / geoffhart -at- mac -dot- com
www.geoff-hart.com
--------------------------------------------------
***Now available*** _Effective onscreen editing_
(http://www.geoff-hart.com/home/onscreen-book.htm)
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-