TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
RE: software control terms -- To "choose" is passive?
Subject:RE: software control terms -- To "choose" is passive? From:Yves JEAUROND <jingting -at- rogers -dot- com> To:"Butler, Darren J Ctr 584 CBSS/GBHAC" <Darren -dot- Butler -dot- ctr -at- Robins -dot- af -dot- mil>, Susan W Gallagher <susanwg -at- gmail -dot- com> Date:Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:20:16 -0400 (EDT)
Darren you are right that choose and select convey the same idea.
Then you add that "to choose" is too passive? Huh?
choose. OED1, to pick out as being the best...
select. OED1, carefully choose as being the best...
If users can't just plain choose, what is this world coming to? :-)
Cheers,
YJ
"Butler, Darren J Ctr 584 CBSS/GBHAC" <Darren -dot- Butler -dot- ctr -at- Robins -dot- af -dot- mil> a écrit :
FWIW - I use "select" as my "go-to" verb whenever an action can be
achieved by multiple methods [...] The word "choose" (in my
view) conveys the same idea but is too passive. One can choose an option
but not take any action regarding it - IMHO.
-----Original Message-----
From:
techwr-l-bounces+darren -dot- butler -dot- ctr=robins -dot- af -dot- mil -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
[mailto:techwr-l-bounces+darren -dot- butler -dot- ctr=robins -dot- af -dot- mil -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot-
com] On Behalf Of Susan W Gallagher
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 11:41 AM
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: Re: software control terms
I have always had a problem saying "select" for anything but a menu or
list
items. My reasoning is that a check box, for example, can be selected
without being checked. Picture the laptop user, or the fast
touch-typist,
who wants to navigate a dialog box without using the mouse. They tab
through
the fields until the appropriate check box item is ***selected*** (i.e.,
has
focus), then press the space bar to check or uncheck the box. Saying
"select" for a check box just isn't accurate, and I don't care what the
good
folks at MS think.
My two cents. Everyone else's mileage is sure to vary.
-Sue Gallagher
On 9/10/07, Combs, Richard wrote:
>
> Christine Leisgen
>
> > I now realized that at least now, Microsoft uses a more "wordy"
> > explanation of software terms, e. g. "activate the check-box
> > for options x". I see that there is the advantage that it is
> > clearer for the user where to look for the option (it is a
> > check box, not a drop-down list).
>
> Where did you see "activate the check-box"? MMOS has always said that
> you _select_ and _clear_ check boxes (no hyphen). And here's what my
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as jingting -at- rogers -dot- com -dot-
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-