TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
It would be a worthy goal, but certification in many fields is
complicated by the very issues that have kept us "uncertified" for so
long. No need to rehash all the arguments, but it's true that the
quality component of any certification is always problematic. Who
defines what is "quality"? Hours alone won't do it. Examinations alone
won't do it. Degrees can't even do it. Certification is no guarantee of
quality. I have worked a variety of "certified" professionals over many
years to whom quality was a foreign concept. Yet they had paid their
money, jumped through some administrative hoops, spent the requisite
hours, taken the training, and proudly framed the certificate. I agree
with Peter.
--Beth
stevefjong -at- comcast -dot- net wrote:
> Peter Neilson wrote, "People who write crap can get certifications," which is an interesting argument.
> A *certificate* you can perhaps get. You can get a certificate for sitting through, say, a one-day workshop on "writing with punch." However, the requirements for *certification* are usually much more demanding. For example, the Project Management Institute's certification requires a master's degree, passing an examination, and 4,500 hours of work in the field.
> If technical writing certification had similar requirements, how would you propose getting through the two years by writing crap?
>
>
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
