TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Usage: Keeping the number of digits consistent? From:Geoff Hart <ghart -at- videotron -dot- ca> To:CEL <copyediting-l -at- listserv -dot- indiana -dot- edu>, techwr-l List <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Tue, 02 Oct 2007 10:15:35 -0400
Thought this might be of interest to folks who work with numbers...
One standard stylistic approach in the sciences is to ensure that
numbers have the same number of decimal places so that comparisons
between numbers are facilitated. For example, in the series 0.02,
0.031, and 0.025, the first number should be changed to 0.020.
The rationale evinced to explain this is interesting (at least if
you're a cognitive psychology geek like I am): adding the trailing
zero makes the comparison of the last digits of the numbers become 20
(not 2) versus 31 versus 25. (The same effect, but in the reverse
order, probably explains why something selling for $49.99 seems less
expensive than something selling for $50.) Is this just theory with
no significant consequences in reality?
As it happens, it does indeed have consequences. I'm currently
editing a manuscript that has already been through an edit by another
editor, and both the editor and the author failed to change the 0.02
to 0.020, and in so doing, failed to notice that the detection limit
of the equipment used to perform the analysis (reported as 0.020) was
larger than many of the numbers (e.g., 0.003, 0.018) presented in the
data. Since the other editor is ordinarily quite careful, I take this
as one data point to support the theory: if both a good editor and an
intelligent author missed this, something more than chance is
probably going on.
Also note that I'm not reporting this to criticize the other editor,
but rather to make the point that sometimes, seemingly trivial style
choices have important underlying reasons.
----------------------------------------------------
-- Geoff Hart
ghart -at- videotron -dot- ca / geoffhart -at- mac -dot- com
www.geoff-hart.com
--------------------------------------------------
***Now available*** _Effective onscreen editing_
(http://www.geoff-hart.com/home/onscreen-book.htm)
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-