TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: is it "backwards" or "backward" compatible? From:"CapDev Communications" <capdev -dot- communications -at- gmail -dot- com> To:"Gene Kim-Eng" <techwr -at- genek -dot- com> Date:Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:28:50 -0700
I had several students in my technical editing class this summer who were
British-educated. They told me that in UK English, it's towards; in American
English, it's toward.
A cursory review of The Economist Style Guide did not indicate any
difference between American and UK conventions for backward or forward but
confirmed what my students said about towards (UK) and toward (American).
For whatever it's worth . . .
Pat
On 10/15/07, Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com> wrote:
>
> I'd go with "backward." You wouldn't say "forwards
> compatible" to describe the program's capability to
> work with data from newer versions.
>
> Gene Kim-Eng
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Melissa Clark" <melissa -dot- s -dot- clark -at- gmail -dot- com>
> Which is the correct terminology -- "backwards" or
> "backward"
> compatible/compatibility? For example: The software is
> backward(s?)
> compatible to the previous hardware version ...
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
> printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
> Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more.
>http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
>
> True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
> Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
> documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as
> capdev -dot- communications -at- gmail -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> or visit
>http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/capdev.communications%40gmail.com
>
>
> To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.
>
>
--
Patricia Egan
P. O. Box 194391
San Francisco, CA 94119-4391
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-