TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
RE: Documentation Correctness was Re: How many levels of indents andheads are reasonable?
Subject:RE: Documentation Correctness was Re: How many levels of indents andheads are reasonable? From:Richard Lewis <tech44writer -at- yahoo -dot- com> To:Dan Goldstein <DGoldstein -at- riverainmedical -dot- com>, techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com Date:Tue, 16 Oct 2007 15:13:00 -0700 (PDT)
I spend alot of my time creating data flow diagrams to tie together disjointed and incomplete requriements and tech specs. I am by no means perfect, however, the difference before and after is usually profound.
But think about it: I am stating that nobody in the TW acedemic or industry communities knows about or is willing to admit to what is key to success in creating quality docs - especially for larger scale systems. Ya have to admit to it, either I am right and the world is wrong, or vice versa.
Sorry, no samples.
Generic Richard
Dan Goldstein <DGoldstein -at- riverainmedical -dot- com> wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Lewis
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 10:25 AM
> To: Raj Machhan; Ned Bedinger
> Cc: techwr-l List
> Subject: Documentation Correctness was Re: How many
> levels of indents andheads are reasonable?
>
> It is easy to tell a TW to be correct, but, if that
> is as far as it goes, it is nothing. Being correct
> means having performed a rigorous analysis. Such
> analysis is based on identifying the essential
> tasks to be performed and, most importantly, the
> interrelationships between the tasks. Unfortunately,
> nobody within the TW community -- either in academia
> or industry -- has discussed this. So incorrect
> documentation is pretty much gauranteed.
>
Except for your own, right? I'm assuming that *your* documentation is
correct, since you are the only TW in the world (in either academia or
industry) who performs a rigorous analysis of the essential tasks to be
performed and the interrelationships between those tasks.
Got any samples for us?
---------------------------------
Yahoo! oneSearch: Finally, mobile search that gives answers, not web links.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-