TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Why does this seem to reinforce the advocacy "Never use Word".
Scott
On Tue Nov 20 7:57 , Geoff Hart sent:
>Nancy Allison wondered:
>created a set of templates, all of which use the SEQ technique to
>create "unbreakable" numbered lists. They were unbreakable . . .
>until all trace of the SEQ field autocorrect entries mysteriously
>dropped out of my templates. All of them.>>
>
<SNIP>
>This suggests that one of the previous field codes has been corrupted
>somehow. One way this might happen is if one of your colleagues has
>their copy of Word set to display the field codes as {field code}
>instead of concealing the codes and displaying only the resulting
>text (here, a number). In that case, it's reasonably easy to scroll
>the cursor into the middle of the brackets and delete a character,
>thereby trashing the field code. Alternatively, if the field codes
>are concealed, someone might have inadvertently deleted the first
>field code in each sequence by trying to manually renumber a
>paragraph, and all subsequent codes that refer back to that original
>code would then be pointing to a nonexistent reference. It's also
>possible that both have happened.
>
>To find out whether this is the case, toggle Word's settings so that
>it displays the codes as {field code}, then check each numbered list
>to see what happened.
>
>
>edited by others, if that has anything to do with it. Undoubtedly
>they use different versions of Word and different operating systems.>>
>
>No idea whether Sharepoint could do this, but using different Word
>versions could explain it. For example, Word XP/2002 and earlier
>versions have this glitch in which comments inserted while revision
>tracking is enabled are accepted when you move between versions.
>They're still present in the file, but are no longer tracked as
>revisions. If possible, you should all be using the same version of
>Word. That eliminates a great many problems.
>
---- Msg sent via Internet America Webmail - http://www.internetamerica.com/
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-