RE: Framemaker and RoboHelp

["Pamela Denchfield" <PamelaD -at- onyx -dot- com>]

Richard Combs wrote: 
 
"...I'm pretty certain that an objective comparison of the two tools 
[FrameMaker and RoboHelp, in the new suite]
leads to the conclusion that Adobe did it right -- your source files
should be authored and maintained in FM, which is far superior for the
task, and RH should be an output engine."

Richard, thanks for your valuable input. Workflow does appear to be the
major differentiator in how one views the quality of Adobe's new suite. 

If any of you reading this message have experience with the suite, I'd
love to hear your take on its single-sourcing utility. Does it work for
you to keep the content in FrameMaker and output as needed to RoboHelp?
Do you have disagreements (or agreements) with reviews you've seen of
the suite? 

Pamela Denchfield

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or 
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007 
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more.
http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList

True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- 

To unsubscribe send a blank email to 
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-  Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.