TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: active vs. passive voice From:Ned Bedinger <doc -at- edwordsmith -dot- com> To:Fred Ridder <docudoc -at- hotmail -dot- com> Date:Fri, 28 Mar 2008 22:58:56 -0700
Fred Ridder wrote:
> Ned Bedinger wrote (in small part):
>
>> That's the well-known process by which the noun 'display' theoretically
>> becomes the intransitive verb display, driven by a logical need for a
>> new term that is specific to a then-new technology.
>>
>> English doesn't reserve this facility only for foreign words. If I set
>> up a display(n) of my wares at the Saturday flea market, I can also say
>> (and be generally understood) that my wares are displayed(v,i) at the
>> flea market. This usage and construction sounds right to my ear, and is
>> just too commonly encountered to be a big dumb mistake made with a
>> transitive verb. English (the living language) seems to allow it.
>
>
> There is a fundamental flaw in your analysis regarding the object of
> the verb.
I'm going to quit working so late.
>
> There *is* a valid intransitive form of the verb "display" but it
> only refers to the mating behavior of certain fauna.
This made me wonder which came first, the intransitive verb or the noun
(also about animal displays). If the intransitive verb was created
deliberately as counterpart to the noun, then I would more easily
understand why it gets to be intransitive while all the other numerous
display verbs coming from the same roots are transitive. I think I'd be
able to find it a direct object, if that's what's wanted.
So I looked up DISPLAY in my copy of OED, a 1980's two volume
photo-reduced bookclub set). I didn't find the intransitive verb
specific to animal behavior, but perhaps I could have if I had found the
magnifying glass I need to read the tiny reduced type. Anyway my eyes
gave out before the entire entry, but I did find a different
intransitive display, specifying that the display be done with
ostentation. While animal displays can be ostentation (I'm thinking of
peacocks), ostentation isn't a feature of all animal displays.
I conclude that there might be two intransitive 'display' verbs. Good
god, what next, three???
BTW, OED reports display (intransitive) as obsolete. I think I'll send
them a link.
Thanks,
Ned Bedinger
doc -at- edwordsmith -dot- com
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-