TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: Business case for dual monitors From:"Greg Holmes" <greg -dot- holmes -at- gmail -dot- com> To:TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Fri, 2 May 2008 06:10:57 -0400
Kevin McLauchlan wrote:
>I'm willing to bet that, with the exception of a few Techwr-l
>members who pride themselves on getting the most out of limited
>tools[*] and pretending that they never experience discomfort...
>the rest of our list-members are either already using multiple
>monitors (or single big'uns), or are even now conniving to get
>'em.
I guess it's just matter of preference. Big monitor, yes.
Wide monitor, definitely. LCD, absolutely.
But I tried dual monitors for a bit and it was just ...
annoying to me. Even when everything worked perfectly[1], I
really didn't feel there was any benefit. They were both wide,
so they really couldn't both be "in front" of me. I had to
have a primary monitor and one "off to the side". It was more
annoying and time consuming to be turning my head then it
was to just flick ALT+TAB and keep my gaze forward. Three
sides of my primary screen were a bumper for my mouse
like normal, but one side was an abyss where the mouse
cursor kept falling off ;)
[1] Which it didn't. Example: oh, I must have dragged an
email off to the side monitor once, so *clearly* that means
I want *all* new emails to open over there from now on.
Not.
Anyway, I understand why dual monitors are better in theory, but
for me personally experience didn't bear that out.
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-