TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
RE: What computer, what software for a lab? (take II)
Subject:RE: What computer, what software for a lab? (take II) From:"Sam Beard" <sbeard -at- oico -dot- com> To:"Geoff Hart" <ghart -at- videotron -dot- ca>, "techwr-l List" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>, "Gene Kim-Eng" <techwr -at- genek -dot- com> Date:Mon, 19 May 2008 10:30:49 -0500
All,
What Geoff says is all true. However, one thing that he possibly
forgot to mention is that VMWare Fusion will allow you to run pretty
much ANY version of Windows from 3.1 all the way up to at least XP, if
not Vista. Parallels Desktop only allows for XP, 2000(?), and Vista, I
believe. Also, I heard that one of them (possibly Fusion?) will allow
you to run a Windows program just like running another Mac app, meaning
that you don't necessarily have to start up the virtualization software,
only the app you want to run. I could be wrong on this, but I seem to
recall reading/hearing something about it.
In any case, as has been mentioned, if you can afford to do so,
buying a Mac can certainly be a good idea, particularly if you want/need
to operate Mac software along with *nix and/or Windows.
Samuel I. Beard, Jr.
Technical Writer
OI Analytical
979 690-1711 Ext. 222
sbeard -at- oico -dot- com
-----Original Message-----
From: techwr-l-bounces+sbeard=oico -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
[mailto:techwr-l-bounces+sbeard=oico -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On Behalf
Of Geoff Hart
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2008 5:33 PM
To: techwr-l List; Gene Kim-Eng
Subject: What computer, what software for a lab? (take II)
Gene Kim-Eng provided a good summary, but his last point requires
clarification: <<If you might need to run both Windows and Mac and
have the budget for it, get Macs and use Bootcamp to enable you to
load Mac OS, Windows or Linux without emulators... Whatever you do,
do NOT attempt to run processor-intensive applications like Maya,
Max, Lightwave, etc., in Windows running on a Mac with an emulator.>>
It's important to distinguish here between an "emulator", such as
Microsoft's own Virtual PC, and "virtualization" software, such as
Parallels or VMWare fusion: Gene is 100% correct that an emulator
will drive you crazy because it's so slow. (Plus, I'm not aware of
any Windows emulators that still run on the Intel chips; Virtual PC
ceased development when the Intel chip Macs came out.)
In contrast, virtualization software runs Windows at full speed, so
all else being equal (i.e., plenty of memory* and a fast hard drive),
you'll never notice you're using it. Indeed, some recent tests showed
that a Mac running Windows under Parallels was faster than a
comparably equipped PC running the same version of Windows; I believe
it was Apple vs. Dell, so we're not talking about a cheapie clone
either. (This seeming anomaly occurred because of how well the system
components are integrated. In that particular test, the Mac was the
better machine. A different PC, such as a top-end gaming machine from
Alienware, might have beaten the Mac by a significant margin.)
* OS X runs just fine in 1 Gig of RAM, as does Windows XP; Vista
requires at least 2 Gig, and 4 is better. So add at least that much
RAM (1 + 1 = 2 Gig for XP, 1 + 2 to 4 = 3 to 5 Gig for Vista) to each
computer if you want to run OS X and Windows side by side. For
Photoshop, even more is better.
Bootcamp is neither emulator nor virtualization software: all it does
is let you choose which OS (Mac vs. Windows) should be loaded each
time you boot. If you never need to run OS X and Windows
simultaneously, it's your best bet because it's free. If you want to
run Mac software side by side with Windows software without having to
reboot, you need either Parallels or Fusion. Which of the two is
better? They keep leapfrogging each other, but Fusion is probably
better if you also need to run Linux simultaneously. VMWare has many
years more experience with virtualization than Parallels.
----------------------------------------------------
-- Geoff Hart
ghart -at- videotron -dot- ca / geoffhart -at- mac -dot- com
www.geoff-hart.com
--------------------------------------------------
***Now available*** _Effective onscreen editing_
(http://www.geoff-hart.com/home/onscreen-book.htm)
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as sbeard -at- oico -dot- com -dot-
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
