RE: Review meetings vs. distributing copies

Subject: RE: Review meetings vs. distributing copies
From: "Downing, David" <DavidDowning -at- Users -dot- com>
To: "Combs, Richard" <richard -dot- combs -at- Polycom -dot- com>, <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:51:01 -0400

Interesting -- so if I just ask for written feedback, they may be saying
-- "Hey, that's not MY job. YOU'RE the writer."

-----Original Message-----
From: Combs, Richard [mailto:richard -dot- combs -at- Polycom -dot- com]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 1:45 PM
To: Downing, David; techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: RE: Review meetings vs. distributing copies

Downing, David wrote:

> The question is -- why does this happen? One theory I've heard is that
> calling a meeting forces people to pay attention and respond, whereas
> just distributing copies of the document lets them set it aside and
> forget it. But I have my own theory -- that the SMEs are more willing
to
> put the time and effort into giving me feedback if I'm willing to make
> the effort to stop hiding in my cubie and be social enough to attend
and
> preside over a meeting. I was wondering which of those theories makes
> more sense to everyone here, and/or whether anyone has their own
theory
> to suggest.

I've seen the same thing, and I think both your theories may be
contributing factors. I can think of two others:

(1) A meeting has a fixed time, so they can't just tell themselves "I'll
try to get around to it later." They either show up, or everyone knows
they've blown it off.

(2) In a meeting, they can _tell you_ what to write. Responding to
review copies forces them to write stuff themselves.

I suspect that for many engineers, item (2) is pretty important. :-)

Richard


Richard G. Combs
Senior Technical Writer
Polycom, Inc.
richardDOTcombs AT polycomDOTcom
303-223-5111
------
rgcombs AT gmailDOTcom
303-777-0436
------







^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more.
http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList

True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.


References:
Review meetings vs. distributing copies: From: Downing, David
RE: Review meetings vs. distributing copies: From: Combs, Richard

Previous by Author: RE: Review meetings vs. distributing copies
Next by Author: RE: Review meetings vs. distributing copies
Previous by Thread: RE: Review meetings vs. distributing copies
Next by Thread: RE: Review meetings vs. distributing copies


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads