Re: Review meetings vs. distributing copies

Subject: Re: Review meetings vs. distributing copies
From: beelia <beelia -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: "Victoria Wroblewski" <victoria -dot- wroblewski -at- eagletest -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 19:27:04 -0700

I agree with Richard - they want to TELL you their changes, and also they
want to be visible, as Victoria mentioned.

Meetings do help, but I also take apart the book and distribute small
sections to the engineers responsible for each unit. I usually get the
feedback I need, and if not, I pester them a couple of times until they come
through. There's no rationale for making people feel guilty about being
really busy, so a sense of humor helps too.

But I realize that it's not always practical to divide up the book. It just
works in my startup environment because everyone knows who's responsible for
each piece.

Bee

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Victoria Wroblewski <
victoria -dot- wroblewski -at- eagletest -dot- com> wrote:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Downing, David
> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 12:33 PM
> To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> Subject: Review meetings vs. distributing copies
>
> Over the past several years, I have noticed a phenomenon connected with
> the age-old problem of getting technical reviews from SMEs. If I just
> distribute copies of a document, either hardcopy or electronic via
> email, and ask for comments back, I always get nada or almost nada. If I
> call a review meeting, people will accept the meeting invitation and
> come to the meeting. In fact, I just had the same group of people accept
> a meeting invite who had hitherto not been giving me any feedback when I
> just sent them copies of the document through email.
>
> The question is -- why does this happen?
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> In places where I've seen the night & day shift when going from
> distributed copies to review meetings, it's been one of two things...
>
> 1 - Very busy engineers who are always putting out new fires, and even
> when they try to put time aside to review docs, they get interrupted.
> When there is a set meeting, they can go to the meeting and give 100%
> focus (until someone pulls them out to put out an inferno of an issue).
>
> 2 - If it's a place where the documentation is so low on the totem pole
> of priorities that it's underground, meetings provide a very visible
> example of who is not contributing as they should. You don't want to be
> the one person/group that is not represented at that meeting, do you?
> Everyone else in the room will be able to tell you're the person/group
> is holding things up, just by seeing you're not there.
>
> - V
>
>
>
> **This transmission may contain information that is privileged,
> confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are
> not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure,
> copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including
> any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this
> transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the
> material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank
> you.**
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
> printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
> Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more.
> http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
>
> True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
> Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
> documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as beelia -at- pacbell -dot- net -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> or visit
> http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/beelia%40pacbell.net
>
>
> To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
> http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.
>
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more.
http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList

True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.


References:
Review meetings vs. distributing copies: From: Downing, David
RE: Review meetings vs. distributing copies: From: Victoria Wroblewski

Previous by Author: Re: The Daily Show on Quotation Marks
Next by Author: Re: [TOOLS] Review/user comments of MS Virtual Destop Manager powertoy
Previous by Thread: RE: Review meetings vs. distributing copies
Next by Thread: Re: Review meetings vs. distributing copies


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads