TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
In the course of different conversations and interests, I've come across
something called the Fairness doctrine, which is supposed to be voted on
by our legislature in the near future.
Apparently, it could cause many radio stations to go off the
air-demanding that everyone gives equal time to opposing points of view.
I've just heard that they have included a clause to expand this to the
Internet and regulating Internet content. How far does a thing like this
go? Would it be implemented *only* on political/religious points of view
(what is planned for radio), or to *ALL* points of view? How would this
impact those of us with opposing points of view for professional
practice? For example, the old Word vs Frame argument?
Can anyone suggest how to research this more fully. Were you aware of
this issue? Does this not amount to censoring the Internet?
ComponentOne Doc-To-Help gives you everything you need to author and
publish quality Help, Web, and print content. Perfect for technical
authors, developers, and policy writers. Download a FREE trial. http://www.componentone.com/DocToHelp/
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-