TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
I get the sense that, in academia, there is a strong movement that
believes the teaching of grammar adds nothing useful to the teaching of
reading and writing.
However, the information I've seen on the subject is unclear and seems
to focus on extremes, such as that teaching only grammar is bad. Well,
sure, teaching only grammar and not its application lacks context. So,
while I would agree that teaching grammar by itself does little good,
teaching a foundation of grammar in conjunction with how to apply
grammar might be worthwhile.
So, I don't react to academics who poo-poo the teaching of grammar
without learning the context of their disdain. And, if the context of
their disdain is that teaching of only grammar doesn't work, then I
don't bother with the argument. If the context of their disdain is that
teaching the basics of grammar in context of larger text doesn't work,
then they have an argument on their hands and I need to see some proof.
Like so many things in life, I see the structure of grammar as necessary
but not independent. So, take what you learn of grammar and apply it to
the larger body of work, and I think you'll do fine.
Cheers,
Sean
-----Original Message-----
From: techwr-l-bounces+sbrierley=accu-time -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
[mailto:techwr-l-bounces+sbrierley=accu-time -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On
Behalf Of Gordon McLean
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 6:05 AM
To: 'Caroline Tabach'
Cc: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: RE: "and then," or simply "then"?
He didn't go into great detail, but he was "despairing" of the grammar
rules section of the book.
Caveat being that he was despairing of most such books, he wasn't just
picking on Strunk and White (I won't even mention what he said about
Lynne
Truss!)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
ComponentOne Doc-To-Help gives you everything you need to author and
publish quality Help, Web, and print content. Perfect for technical
authors, developers, and policy writers. Download a FREE trial. http://www.componentone.com/DocToHelp/
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-